In a glaring economic paradox, Al-Othaim Markets' profits declined by 33.9% during Ramadan 2025 - the peak consumption season for the sector - to cap a structural loss of 55% of its market value over five years. On the other side, Al-Sadhan Markets, with its historic weight spanning 75 years, chose a "tactical retreat" by closing its large retail properties (which Binnda later acquired some of) and shifting toward smaller formats.
These moves, documented by researcher and economic analyst Abdullah Al-Khamissi, are not mere temporary financial stumbles or routine restructuring. They represent a "macroeconomic shock" marking the end of an "horizontal expansion" era, where inflation and changing consumer behavior reset the rules of the game in favor of "dark stores" and "hard discount" models.
The Burden of Toxic Assets: Capital Expenditures (CapEx) Trapped in Operations
For decades, traditional retail strategy was based on a simple formula: larger display space means higher market share. Al-Othaim practiced this model aggressively, pumping massive capital expenditures to open 115 new branches between 2023 and 2025, bringing its network to over 407 branches across 114 cities.
But the numbers proved that spatial expansion without sales density immediately becomes toxic assets that raise operating costs (OpEx). This discovery recently forced management to sharply reduce expansion pace to just 10-12 branches for 2025 and 2026.
Conversely, Al-Sadhan absorbed the lesson early; it rid itself of large space rentals and heavy labor and energy costs, repositioning since 2024 toward an "Express" model with 17 operating branches and 17 under construction, targeting over 40 highly efficient branches by end of 2026. Abandoning "hypermarkets" here is a victory for unit economics over the arrogance of geographic expansion.
"Compensatory Inferences" and the Aldi Effect
A survey by "Al-Eqtisadiah" newspaper of essential goods reveals a price disparity that exposes profit leakage from upscale stores. The basic consumer basket reached its peak at "Danube" with a cost of 615 riyals (+2%), followed by "Carrefour", "Binalla", and "Al-Tamimi" with costs exceeding 600 riyals. While declining at "Al-Othaim" and "Al-Sadhan" to a range of 586-593 riyals, and stabilizing at "Lulu" at 571 riyals (-1%).
This disparity opened a strategic gap swallowed by new low-cost models (such as Salah Al-Iqtisadiah and KQ). As Wall Street Journal analyses of the American "Aldi" model show, stores using spaces not exceeding 12,000 square feet and limited to 1,600 SKUs (compared to 31,000 in traditional supermarkets) succeed in destroying competitors' margins. Consumers under inflation pressure practice what economics calls "compensatory inferences"; they understand that low prices in these models result from supply efficiency (selling products in their boxes, less staff), not poor quality.
Logistics Eat Real Estate: The Rise of Dark Stores
The most dangerous competitor to hypermarkets no longer sits on the opposite street, but in the customer's pocket. The arrival of "Ninja" app to 100 dark stores across 28 cities, and achieving a compound annual revenue growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 182% (versus 18% for Jahez app), reflects the shift of power from "real estate management" to "logistics management".
The dark store bypasses traditional competitors (such as Binalla with 194 branches and Al-Tamimi with 111 branches) by isolating expensive display and decoration costs, directing them entirely toward demand prediction algorithms and last-mile delivery speed matching customer location.
Al-Othaim's awareness of this reality forced them to seek a logistical exit through their upcoming agreement with "Amazon", in an attempt to integrate its infrastructure assets and relationship with 500 suppliers into an integrated e-commerce ecosystem.
Saudi Arabia's retail sector faces an inevitable correction of value equation. The lesson learned is clear: the customer no longer values "wide aisles" and excessive choices if they'll cost them purchasing power or consume their time. Survival in the coming decade depends on two paths and no third: either transform into a logistics hybrid using branches as "micro-fulfillment centers" serving e-commerce, or radically shift toward high-efficiency compact store models. Anyone insisting on selling "spatial luxury" to a customer seeking "price and time efficiency" will ultimately find themselves nothing but a structure of illusion.. that falls.
Comments (6)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!